In response to:

Why Legalizing SSM Threatens Religious Liberty and Freedom of Conscience

GustaveMolinari Wrote: Apr 06, 2013 11:56 AM
In a Libertarian America like the one the Constitution is set up for - all would be free to express themselves and they would be protected to do so.
dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Apr 06, 2013 1:27 PM


This is not a Libertarian America. Homosexual license is not protected under any constitution. Dishonest people only wish it was.

(Mr Molinari:

You confuse license and perversion for liberty.)

juanitavaldez Wrote: Apr 06, 2013 12:14 PM
The problem is this--liberals and those who promote homosexual "marriage" are doing it so that they can eliminate believers from having jobs, running companies and doing anything in the public arena.

We have a right to practice our religion 24/7/365, which includes not assisting in same-sex 'marriage' whether it be making cakes, taking photos, catering, renting space or other functions.

What happens to people of faith who support traditional marriage after the legal definition of marriage is redefined as anything other than a union between one man and one woman? Simple: Their views, I assure you, will be deemed “intolerable” -- and the state will feel compelled to act. Indeed, we’re already seeing this line of persecution happening in Europe (via the Catholic News Agency):

The Danish government recently determined that “gay marriage” includes a right to get married in any church in the country, even if that church objects to such unions. Churches throughout the country will...