1 - 10 Next
In response to:

No Better for Obama Next Week, Either

guestwho2 Wrote: May 19, 2013 4:41 PM
Nobody said fascism was fair.
The testing wouldn't be necessary if the teachers were doing their jobs. The tests are, in effect, the rest of society asking "Why are ignorant 'graduates' being foisted on us year after year, given the oceans of cash we've spent on public schools?" We simply can't believe that the teachers are, well, failing this miserably and consistently. And no, the teachers aren't standing up for any students, only themselves. It's amazing how many continue to be taken in by that tissue-thin ruse.
In response to:

Obama's Sneaky, Deadly, Costly Car Tax

guestwho2 Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 9:55 AM
Once again, the reference was specifically to the Obama administration who have a demonstrable and sordid history of cronyism. What is 'ignorant' about stating facts versus, say, repeating worn-out phrases like pandering, extremists, mindless, rush, hannity, etc? You also missed the quotation marks around investment, apparently, which denote irony. You see, investment implies risk taken with an expectation - or at least a hope - of a return. A politician unilaterally writing taxpayer-funded checks to businesses who share his ideological agenda is light years away from risk as an investor would view it.
In response to:

Obama's Sneaky, Deadly, Costly Car Tax

guestwho2 Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 7:48 AM
The reference was to the Obama administration. Before you decry ignorance perhaps you should work on basic reading comprehension.
Sorry but you've already proved beyond a doubt that you are a moron. The evidence: 1) You believe there are 100 reasons for voting for Obama 2) You will vote for Obama 3) You believe we have an interest in 'what you stand for.' 4) You believe that reasons for voting for Obama involve thought Save yourself the time and go out and get some air.
In response to:

Obama Losing Independents

guestwho2 Wrote: Jul 12, 2012 9:12 PM
I keep hearing that Romney & Co are keeping their powder dry. Why? Why wait when Obama is at his most vulnerable now? The DNC convention will inevitably be treated as the Second Second Coming by the press. If Obama is faltering, they will claim he's found his voice again. If he's still competitive, they will claim he's closed the deal. Why wait until Obama has a chance to raise more cash? If Romney outspends Obama isn't it smart to do it now in an effort to demoralize any Obama donors who don't want to back a loser, thus saving Romney from spending gazillions against any real or media-crafted Obama comeback? If Romney has the dirt on Obama that the Clintons were afraid to use then unleash the Kraken and bury Obama!
In response to:

Why Obama Will Lose in a Landslide

guestwho2 Wrote: Jul 08, 2012 9:30 PM
It's a shame you chose ignorance and obstinance. The point he was making is that his analysis is not swayed by his vote.
In response to:

Why Obama Will Lose in a Landslide

guestwho2 Wrote: Jul 08, 2012 9:26 PM
The point he was making is that he's neutral on the GOP / Dem choices.
In response to:

It's Not the Same-Sex Marriage, Stupid

guestwho2 Wrote: May 18, 2012 7:24 AM
Romney blueprint: analyze McCain 2008. Do opposite.
In response to:

A Plumber To Snake The DC Drain

guestwho2 Wrote: Apr 29, 2012 10:36 AM
Don't forget that Operation Destroy Joe was aided and abetted by his own state government (of the people, etc.). Columbus bureaucrats illegally obtained and leaked his personal details. They received a slap on the wrist. It's laughable to hear leftists moan about money and corporations in elections when they control every government institution funded with your cash (forget the political party in temporary power...statists are statists). It's akin to fighting WWII while funding German and Japanese war manufacturing.
1 - 10 Next
Friday, May 24 | 08:26 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 08:26 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 08:26 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 08:26 AM ET