In response to:

Good Guys With Guns

MAHB001 Wrote: Jan 05, 2013 11:25 AM
It was reported that the first shots in Aurora were not lethal. I maintain that a good guy with a gun could have stopped all the loss of life in Colorado that day. In some respects, the Left is getting their way. Through the Left Stream Medias control of negative public opinions about guns, they have made it unpopular to even like guns. They have already created their gun free zones. And as predicted, those zones have sitting ducks as victims. The Left Stream Media is falsifying the “news” to suit their ends. But, what do you think they are getting out of it? Why do it when the unintended consequences is more loss of life?
rficara Wrote: Jan 05, 2013 8:22 PM
The killer passed up SIX other theaters because the one in Aurora specifically place "no guns" signs at the door. The rest did not. That's how he chose the spot.

Ray
NRA Life
Ron781 Wrote: Jan 05, 2013 1:33 PM
The Left Stream Media is falsifying the “news” to suit their ends. But, what do you think they are getting out of it?

A disarmed population is one of the first steps to a communist society controlled by a dictator. Wonder who the dictator-in-waiting is? Open your eyes and note the slime ball we re-elected.

The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.

That statement, from NRA president Wayne LaPierre, was immediately turned into a laugh line by the press, deemed everything from “deadly spin” to “delusional” to “paranoid.” The New York Daily News proclaimed that anti-gun cranks—oops, I mean “mental health experts”—who had never met LaPierre had diagnosed him as crazy.

As someone who went to journalism school and has worked in media for years, I’m used to this. Left-leaning editors and reporters declare what “everyone” knows and “everyone” thinks, while pretending to be...