1 - 10 Next
Check his Wiki entry. I don't know about "several" but he was removed from a significant case by a higher court that found bias.
No, this judge's rulling will have no effect at all on this nonsense.
As much as I agree with him, the court overstepped its authority and considered an issue not before the court, essentially an advisory opinion. It is worthless.
Gosh, would it be possible to disagree with Barone's position without calling him a fool? Why are we so intent on hammering each other?
Gosh, would it be possible to disagree with Barone's position without calling him a fool? Why are we so intent on hammering each other?
Totally agree on same sex marriage. It's a perfect opportunity for a conservative to make a point --- "This is a state issue. As president I would respect the system of federalism set forth in the Constitution."
In response to:

Still More Politicized Pseudo-Science?

gtanv Wrote: Dec 13, 2014 10:30 AM
"this year’s canola (rapeseed) crop". I'm pretty sure he meant "grapeseed".
Pantaleo's lawyer is, to say the least, biased, and is not testimony.
So, why don't we know the evidence? Some of it is secret, by law, but where are the legions of people out there explaining that Pantaleo is right when he says he didn't use a chokehold? We have that part of the confrontation on film. If the hold he used was proper police work, you would think there would be people willing to say so. I've not heard it.
Or perhaps it's because police have a right to use force that is not afforded to the general public, and/or because cops are generally dealing with criminals as part of their duties.
1 - 10 Next