In response to:

Academic Malpractice Part 818

gsw Wrote: Sep 24, 2012 10:49 PM
Nawlins 72 thinks the human organism is equally good and bad. Nawlins72 is wrong. Of course humans have instincts and drives - all animals do. However those instincts and drives are directly related to the particular survival of the concerned organism - as we know from our knowledge of evolutionary behavior – and they are not altruistic.. Humans are socialized and cultured to not be selfish and "evil" or "bad". Absent such behavior modifications the organism remains self-centered and self-gratifying all its life. Some are more successfully socialized and cultured than others – that’s why we have Christians and conservatives on the good end and liberals and Islamic fanatics on the other. See how it works?
nawlins72 Wrote: Sep 25, 2012 5:22 AM
I see how gaymg still cant post a cogent argument.
gsw Wrote: Sep 26, 2012 2:46 AM
There was no argument being made - again just further indication of your lack of knowledge - you say the most absurd things and don't even realize how foolish they make you sound. You are unable to comprehend complex issues which is why they so consistently elude you - that and the fact that you are not very learned. Even your pitiful retort contained three errors in grammar, two words used incorrectly, poor syntax and weak form.
Author’s Note: This is the 818th column I have written since September of 2003. If you are tired of hearing about liberal hypocrisy in academia, please do not read this latest offering. If you like guns, however, keep reading.

Dear Professor Hoplophobe (pseudonym):

First I would like to thank you for your willingness to discuss Second Amendment issues despite our deep disagreement about the scope and applicability of this important constitutional right. The first time we broached the issue, the tenor of our discussion was less than civil. Since then, you have agreed to continue...