In response to:

Government Shouldn't Define 'Church'

GRusling Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 9:27 AM
It's simple. I clearly recall my Grandparents saying they were going to the "Church House" and on many occasions the "Church" met on creek and river banks for the purpose of a picnic. It was called a "Church Picnic" and there was no building of any nature involved. Mr. Thomas is correct. It's the "body of people" that make up the church... No building necessary and Obama is so badly mistaken it's difficult to believe he has EVER been part of any "church"...
MarilynBr Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 3:33 AM
He was on the membership roster of a church, but did he really attend and participate on a regular basis? I'm inclined to doubt it.

Under pressure from religious and conservative groups, the Obama administration has offered another compromise on the issue of birth control coverage within the Affordable Care Act. While exempting churches and some religiously affiliated institutions, such as hospitals and universities, from supplying the coverage, the new proposal calls for their employees to receive stand-alone private insurance policies providing birth control coverage at no cost. Insurance companies will foot the bill, but only the naive can possibly think the cost won't find its way back to the institution in the form of higher health premiums.

Numerous lawsuits filed against this and other portions...