1 - 7
Here is a wonderful bit of news where Obama has his say: "Barack Obama Lavishes Praise on Queen, NHS and Gordon Brown" Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/05/23/barack-obama-lavishes-praise-on-queen-nhs-and-gordon-brown-115875-23149822/
Like the idea of a Government controlled health care sector? Look at what it has done to the supply of physicians in Canada: "The number of emigrant physicians approximates the current physician shortage in all Canadian provinces. ...Our findings are in contrast to pronouncements that emigration is not a major contributor to physician shortages in Canada." In other words the "progressive" intelligentsia in Canda are lying. And to where are these physicians emigrating mostly? To practice in the Really Bad United States Health Care Sector, according to the sociological study in this medical journal: "Collectively, this is equivalent to having 2 average-sized Canadian medical schools dedicated to producing physicians for the United...
In response to:

Who gives to charity?

groovamos Wrote: Jan 19, 2011 11:46 AM
" use their donations to fight against basic rights for the LGBT community." Oh yeah these Salvation Army types drive their vehicles to your "community" and try to stop you from speaking freely, working for a living, associating or sleeping with whom you want, worshipping as you please. Real totalitarians these Salvation Army types. " one old, stodgy evangelical charity. " Hey you leftists, this is your definition of anti-stodgy: http://gawker.com/5733494/peeing-policewoman-sculpture-pisses-off-german-cops So wonderful. So, you know, grown up.
Oh right, now we are to believe these guys were socialists. You forget that the ideology of present day leftist thought didn't come about until early-mid ninteenth century. You really think Franklin and Adams were all about socialism, set asides, money grabs from the treasury? You think they were all about easy sex and let-it-slide life philosophy? You think they were philosophical materialists? You think they were all about mocking the Creator, Christmas, and reverence for life? And get this: You think they revered a 19th century demigod like Darwin? You are a barrel of laughs.
That's why I'm a classical liberal just like Franklin, Adams, Jefferson, Washington and the other original patriots. To say that these patriots who founded a nation were not nationalists is ridiculous. You Leftists have never founded a civilization and the ones that your comrades took over either collapsed or are in a state of collapse like N. Korea and Cuba, and just watch what happens to Venezuela. You guys have no clue what elements are required at the founding of a civilization and required for its survival.
M. Pat Lib is so self-congratulatory, so NOT ridiculous enough to be a victim. So how come Pat Lib seems to give racial groups a great big pass regarding the victim game, huh? Must mean such victims deserve to see themselves as perpetual victims, right? Brilliant. A really winning strategy in life. Suppose I, a white guy, were to join the ever growing group of victims seeking compensation from the Ag department, claiming I was "discriminated" against when trying to get "government handout" goodies bak in the '90's. Guess what? I would be immediately disqualified because of my race, comprende? My victimhood denied? Am I a victim because I complain of this? No. Do I see it as great sport to complain and point this out to stupid leftists...
In response to:

Barney Frank Comes Home to Facts

groovamos Wrote: Aug 21, 2010 11:29 AM
Here are a few: 1. Gay is part of the Universal Plan. 2. Gays are that way because God made them that way. 3. Gay couples can raise kids just as well as straight couples. 4. (while growing up): I'm not gay. 5. Gays are not likely pedophile any more than straights. Let's do a thought experiment and show this last one: 1. Estimates on the proportion of homosexuals in the priesthood since the '70's: 50% 2. Numbers of young males abused by priests: 100's 3. Numbers of young females abused by priests: not reported 4. Numbers of young females so abused should equal numbers of young males, given #1 above. 5. Conclusion: heterosexual priests and and heterosexuals in general much less likely pedophile than gays.
1 - 7