In response to:

Lanza Tried to Buy Rifle Before Shooting But Was Denied

GrlScoutLdr Wrote: Dec 16, 2012 10:37 PM
Nooooo... All of the victims were shot with the assault weapon, AR-15. Only one shot was from the Glock and that was the self inflicted shot that ended the shooter's life. These babies were shot anywhere from 3 to 11 shots per child. These children did not have any chance of survival. If the shooter did not have any access to an assault semi-automatic maybe some would be alive. He spent Hundreds of rounds of amno in a few brief minutes! Why would you even think to send our babies to schools with armed guards? That is total insanity! Listen to yourselves!!
bmaciver Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 9:05 AM
We spend money to protect politicians-with guns.

We spend money to protect money in transit-with guns.

We spend NO money protecting children in a school building.
anonymous12400 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 5:45 PM
Try reading this article. It seems to describe your attitude very well.
HongKongCharlie4 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 7:49 AM
Try to lay off the theatrics in your posts and it might get more attention. The AR-15 as sold to civilians is not an assault weapon. It's a semi-automatic rifle. Just one of many. A revolver is a semi automatic assault weapon also. Fired multiple times with one loading.

What are you saying? Are you saying that all guns should be single shot load by hand in between shots, type of gun?

Take a deep breath, I would support you in this if all the so called public servants have the same type as the civilians.

Could you support this?