In response to:

Women in Combat

Greg633 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 11:52 AM
This change of policy will weaken our military and cost lives. That is what Mr. Obama wants. No discussions. No studies. Just another childish decision DICTATED from above.
45caliber Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 1:36 PM
After Desert Storm one of our (Demo) Congressmen said that the war as was fought "wasn't fair". We had a few hundred people killed; they had several hundred thousand killed. He insisted that we should not fight unless we had as many casualties as they did and we should use the same equipment as they did and not our better stuff. I suppose that he wanted our military to count up how many enemy casualties we inflicted each day and then choose every tenth person on our own side to shoot to make up the difference.
Jay Wye Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 2:20 PM
the morons don't understand that combat is not meant to be "fair",you WANT to overwhelmingly dominate the enemy,beat them SO badly they don't want to fight any more,and do it while not losing OUR soldiers.
Fooling Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 12:00 PM
The "man" is a freaking savage. He and his Democrat socialist wannabe dictators would do great ruling Rwanda. Not a formerly great Republic.

A senior Defense Department official said the ban on women in combat should be lifted because the military's goal is "to provide a level, gender-neutral playing field." I'd like to think the goal of the military should be to have the toughest, meanest fighting force possible. But let's look at "gender-neutral playing field."

The Army's physical fitness test in basic training is a three-event physical performance test used to assess endurance. The minimum requirement for 17- to 21-year-old males is 35 pushups, 47 situps and a two-mile run in 16 minutes, 36 seconds or less. For females of the same age,...