In response to:

Will Republicans Support Yet Another Bush for President?

Greg2244 Wrote: Dec 03, 2012 8:39 PM
um... NO!!! Rubio is the only candidate I get excited about. No one else in the party can communicate conservative principles like Marco.
LouLouise Wrote: Dec 03, 2012 11:00 PM
Rubio is for amnesty and open borders. How is that conservative? Besides, Rubio is ineligible to serve as POTUS. Not a natural born citizen.
Panda Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 3:53 AM
Rubio is not for "amnesty and open borders."

Jeez, rejoin the real world, 'kay?
Wendy60 Wrote: Dec 03, 2012 9:52 PM
Rubio is a neocon. He is for foreign aid and nation building by the U.S. military. Simply unacceptable. But go ahead and smack libertarians in the face again with another establishment candidate and pretend like your opinion of a candidate is what determines whether he will win the election. That worked so well with Romney and Ryan, didn't it?
Panda Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 3:52 AM
Actually, while Rubio is a Peace-Through-Strengther, he wouldn't be a big slap in the faces of Libertarians. There's a fair amount of crossover between them.
In January 2008, at a John McCain rally in Columbia, S.C., I asked a number of local politicos to look back to the brutal 2000 Republican primary in their state, the one between McCain and George W. Bush. They had all supported Bush back then, and I asked whether, given the inconclusive wars, runaway federal spending and economic catastrophe of the next eight years, they felt they made the right choice.

The answer was yes. They explained that they had strongly supported Ronald Reagan, and then they supported George H.W. Bush because they had supported Reagan, and then supported George...