One of the most controversial wings of the pro-life movement is the “personhood” effort. Championed by Personhood USA out of Colorado, its goal is to have personhood defined in law to include the unborn. Theoretically, it sounds good. Practically, it will never work and meanwhile is severely hurting the pro-life movement.
The pro-life movement does not support the personhood effort. Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum issued this statement about it, “Nearly every reputable pro-life leader has criticized the approach of the personhood amendment, which will simply give more power to pro-abortion judges.” Another statement from...












In a civilization of laws, the government must define these things. It is up to the rest of us to help make sure the gov't gets it RIGHT.
A baby in the womb has the complete DNA chain from the moment their first single cell emerges from the uniting of a sperm cell and an egg cell. The new individual's DNA is unique - different than the DNA of mother and father.
How are you going to define personhood unless it is by saying a person is a unique, living, human individual. All of which terms apply to the tiniest human Zygote.
I recommend taking a refresher course in Biology 101. Science has moved on, and the sooner the pro-life community informs itself, the sooner we can argue facts instead of emotions.
An unborn baby is either human or not. Those who think its not human have the responsibility to come up with clear, scientific proof that it makes a definitive transition from a state of "could be human but might be a cockatiel, a cocker spaniel, or a coffee bush" to "actually human" at a specific point in time.
If it is human its a person. And as a person it has the complete set of rights possessed by all humans -- first among which is the right to life.