In response to:

Is Mitt Being Neoconned Into War?

greenback Wrote: Jul 31, 2012 10:20 PM
...We can always afford to defend Freedom from an immediate threat. I believe Governor Romney spoke well. He defended Israel's right for defense, with or without any help. He also did not give in to the notion we should be weak, as well as, indicate to our friends we will not back them up. Governor Romney did imply and/or I believe he noted he would have Israel's back, per se, whether it is verbally (encouragement), through a typical process of law, consulting, use of weaponry and intelligence, or if need be a blatant physical presence of strength. In the end, "it is what it is." Governor Romney is clear in his support for Israel; he respects their rights; without sentiment for war, as he preferred likeness in Reagan's abilities.

Has Mitt Romney given Israel a blank check for war?

So it seemed from the declaration in Jerusalem by his adviser Dan Senor, who all but flashed Israel a green light for war, signaling the Israelis that, if you go, Mitt's got your back:

"If Israel has to take action on its own in order to stop Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect that decision."

"No option would be excluded. Gov. Romney recognizes Israel's right to defend itself and that it is right for America to stand with it."

What does "stand with"...

Friday, May 24 | 08:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 08:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 08:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 08:30 PM ET