In response to:

I Am Not Stoned: Sobering Realities For Taxpayers On The Road To Legalizing Marijuana

Grant75 Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 4:44 PM
"[R]epeal of the pot bans [in Colorado and Washington] will —unless the federal government interferes—yield some significant benefits. ... First, crime in Colorado and Washington will fall. Violence between drug dealers will fall—as will the marijuana revenues collected by violent gangs. Second, the demand for hard drugs like crack cocaine and crystal meth will fall. That's because in the long run some drug users will consume less of these hard drugs and more marijuana, as the supply of pot increases and its price falls. (Consumption will not increase enough to push prices up.) . . . .
Grant75 Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 4:45 PM
. . . . Third, Colorado and Washington residents will enjoy a "peace dividend" from scaling back the war on drugs. For example, the police will direct more of their efforts toward fighting violent crime and fraud." . . . economics professor Art Carden (Independent Institute 11/7/12) . . .

Pot fans got what they wanted in Colorado: they finally convinced voters there to support the legalization of “recreational marijuana.” It’s seen as a huge victory for those who support the powers of the individual states, and a great example of “federalism” in action. But who is considering the burden of all of this on the American taxpayer?

Before I go further, let me be clear: I have never in my entire life consumed marijuana. When I was a kid I was out of step with my peers on this, but I’ve just never been interested in “trying it,” and that’s...

Sunday, May 19 | 07:16 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 07:16 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 07:16 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 07:16 AM ET