In response to:

2012 Election Doesn't Give Obama a Mandate

GordonSm3 Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 9:49 AM
No, but it does give him four more years as well as proving that Mitt and the Koch brothers can not buy the election. How does it feel to be the 47%? Can I draw you a map to Canada on the back of your Romney/Ryan yard sign? All I ask is that you take Trump with you.
Ken85 Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 9:58 AM
What it does prove is that George Soros and foreigners CAN buy elections right along with Hollywood and other Communist organizations. Democrats have been putting more and more people on the public teat for the past 60+ years in the hopes of reaching this point. America has reached that first step into 1000 years of darkness Reagan spoke of.
upwithRomney Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 10:49 AM
Most of the money that supported Romney came from extremely rich people. Most of Obama's money came from people. More money for O came from the military persons than for R. I live in Wisconsin and more money was spent by the Koch brothers from Texas in Wisconsin than was spent by Wisconsin residents and still a Gay female democrat won the Senate. People actually do matter. Money is NOT free speech. It is screaming through a bull horn at people holding their ears.
InAmericaSince1627 Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 9:54 AM
Humor is NOT your long suit, neither is intelligent thought.

President Barack Obama won re-election tonight without winning as many electoral votes as he did the last time around after facing a serious threat because of his first term agenda. Now beware of people in the mainstream media proclaiming that there's some kind of "mandate" for Barack Obama to run with.

As Ron Fournier points out at the National Journal, President Obama completely sold out the hopes, dreams and...