In response to:

The Price of Obeying Obama

Gordon242 Wrote: Jul 04, 2012 11:00 AM
HEY ROMNEY / FEHRNSTROM Get Your Message Straight............. The Mandate can be a PENALTY under STATE LAW because there's no Interstate Commerce Clause in the Massachusetts' Constitution................ But the Mandate is a TAX under FEDERAL LAW because there's an Interstste Commece Clause in the U.S. Constitution............ The Supreme Ct. says it's a TAX, Obama's Solicitor General calls it a tax........... And Obama hired 1,650 I.R.S. agents to enforce it as a tax............

WASHINGTON -Several issues are getting distorted in the wake of the Supreme Court's contradictory, backdoor ruling that upheld President Obama's health care law on a disputed word definition.

Others are virtually absent from the discussion, like who will pay the onerous penalty tax and what will it cost them, if the uninsured refuse to obey Obama's order to purchase medical insurance?

It turns out, the court's decision means Obama's tax will fall most heavily on lower-to-middle-income people that he has vowed to shield from his proposed tax increases. And it will be a lot costlier than you think, but more on...