1 - 10 Next
Hey Harry, you don’t have a problem you are the problem!!
CASE IN POINT: You get the government you vote for. As I see it the less he shows up the better because he can do less damage.
While I would agree that business owners have the right to have a no-gun policy they don’t have a right to my business. Because I carry at all times and the gun laws, most everywhere, make it illegal to ignore the No Weapons sign those of us that carry are inconvenienced at a minimum. A person walking up to a business entrance the reverses course to disarm is a signal that they are armed. If that person is watched the car the gun will be left in and where it is in the car makes stealing it simple. I would submit that an unattended gun is a greater threat to public safety than one in the control of a CCW permit holder. One solution would be is to include in the gun laws a provision that REQUIRES business owners that ban guns to include that information in every newspaper ad and when advertising on TV. At least CCW permit holders would know where no to shop.
And, this is why I will NEVER go to New Jersey.
In response to:

Infidels Beware!

GOOD OL' BAD GUY Wrote: Aug 12, 2014 10:47 AM
The adherence to the will of Allah and the fact Muslims are allowed, perhaps obligated, to lie to infidels makes it impossible to identify who can be trusted. That leaves us with one, and only one, way to assess the credibility of politicians, i.e., don't believe ANYTHING they say, judge them by what they do. The question, "How many of her fellow believers do not openly resign but continue to stay in governmental service to simply undermine for the benefit of Islam?" can only be answered by watching the actions of those in government. If you apply the 'watch what they do' to the highest office your conclusion may be the same as mine. If that doesn't concern you American is in a world of hurt.
In addition to proving eligibility to vote with photo ID a method of identifying those that have voted would really close the loop. Even those voting in Afghanistan and Iraq were dipping their finger in ink or some other stain that last long until the polls closed. Don’t expect the idea to catch hold; it would reduce or eliminate voter fraud.
In response to:

Are We Going Broke?

GOOD OL' BAD GUY Wrote: Aug 09, 2014 10:54 AM
FedFarm, A person has to be incredibly naive to believe ANY number from government. As my mother said, “Figures don’t lie but liars can figure.”
In response to:

Are We Going Broke?

GOOD OL' BAD GUY Wrote: Aug 09, 2014 10:46 AM
Exactly my thought! Anyone that doesn’t come up with the same conclusion would ask if Rosie O'Donnell will get fat or will Donald Trump become rich.
lgunman, The allegation that corporations favor amnesty to reduce labor costs makes no sense. From personal experience I can tell you that the cost for training employees is a major is a major business expense even if a new employee is educated and speaks English. Secondly, retaining an employee that you have paid to train can’t be ignored. One sure way to increase the expense AND THE COST OF YOUR PRODUCT OR SERVICE is to take on the problem of training those with low levels of education and a language barrier. When you factor in the reduced employee retention of those without community ties hiring an illegal alien is a VERY poor business decision.
When Carson was replaced Leno was a good choice but Fallon has taken the show off my list. I tried watching Letterman but it didn’t take long to figure he wasn’t funny, silly maybe, but not funny. For some reason, I didn’t really care what went on behind the curtain. Entertainment is entertainment, nothing more or nothing less. If Leno takes on a show elsewhere that will on my list.
1 - 10 Next