If they even said that, it has nothing to do with what I said.

You haven't addressed my response to your invitation, puss.y.

Made a specific ruling in a specific situation almost 75 years ago. When schools were segregated.

No. You don't understand words. Not ONLY things interstate, but also things HAVING A SUBSTANTIAL EFFECT ON interstate commerce. God. And the States themselves can touch it, too! I'm talking purely about the feds.

Sure, big dog.

At issue where? You tell me to drink the Kool Aid (learn the Gun Control argument), then tell me I've been drinking it? Which is it?

Yes. We should. No one has given me a single reason that we should not. Also, we cannot is not an argument. Contrary to what big dog off the chain says, I've read the Constitution. Congress can regulate things having a substantial affect on interstate commerce for the general welfare. Or tax the shite out of ammo. Assuming Congress can prove a substantial relationship to commerce, which they can, boom. Also, States themselves have every right to enact legislation to ban automatic weapons. And I never said "assault rifles."

Nope. The name good lord was picked with little thought. It is an expression used when someone says something outlandish/absurd/incredibly stupid. Like you.

That's what I thought.

Keep waiting, minority.

So, blaming gun laws is not alright, but blaming Democrats is? Why didn't I meet any people like you in college? Or law school? Right, you're fcuking stupid.