1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Freedom From Religion

GoldenEagles Wrote: Feb 11, 2012 10:47 PM
God our Father will of course answer appropriate prayers that issue from a sincere heart. What is a sincere heart? And what kind of prayers are appropriate in this situation where the U.S. Military is being used to promote rebellion against the Laws of God? A sincere heart is focused on obedience to the Laws of God and the Commandments of Christ. I think a sincere heart would know that an institution which is now committed to advancing the cause of Rebellion against the Laws of God, has forfeited its access to God's Assistance. The Angels of God cannot be tasked to assist in any way the winning of battles by homosexual armies. These soldiers are completely on their own in this regard.
In response to:

Freedom From Religion

GoldenEagles Wrote: Feb 10, 2012 6:20 PM
Ollie, we all know that Atheist Armies can fight. We saw that in the Korean War. We saw that in Vietnam. And we are seeing that in the Taliban. (Believing in a totally false god is equivalent to Atheism, and just as deluded) . Having served on the battlefield when U.S. Forces had the benefits of Divine Providence, I wonder if you could not write an article giving us your opinion as to what are the implications of a U.S. Military, whose operations, no longer qualify for a single drop of divine assistance. And that is organization wide, including all facets, funding, acquisition, supply, training, intelligence, air combat operations, sea combat operations, ground combat operations, and special ops.
In response to:

Freedom From Religion

GoldenEagles Wrote: Feb 10, 2012 5:25 PM
The U.S. Military has become a homosexual promotion organization with a global reach. It no longer has the sponsorship of Divine Providence. The American people should think long and hard about the implications of that fact. The number of individuals in leadership positions in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, stood, as of 2009, at eight-hundred and thirteen thousand, three-hundred and sixty-four (813,364). All of them are now forced, by law, to promote rebellion against the Lord God. This ought to shock the conscience of every American patriot. The ground in Arlington National Cemetery is on the move, as thousands of American heroes who gave their lives for One Nation Under God, roll over in their graves.
In response to:

Strategic Capitulation

GoldenEagles Wrote: Feb 02, 2012 1:33 PM
One strategic defeat follows another. Traditional values were defeated on a strategic level when the U.S. Military leadership bent over backwards to pave the way, making themselves into the most infamous doormat in history, over which the homosexual lobby marched triumphantly into every U.S. military organization in the nation. The will to stand up for what it right has been defeated. Minds are filled now with delusions, before which the people worship, their heads pressed down, into a posture of reverence, by the heavy hand of fear. What think ye now of Obama contention that homosexuals in the military will make America stronger?
In response to:

SOTU Surrender

GoldenEagles Wrote: Jan 28, 2012 6:53 PM
The military swallowed the BIG LIE that Obama's homosexual agenda would make the U.S. Military stronger. Now they are reaping the fruits of their dereliction of duty. The spineless leadership that allowed homosexuals to serve openly, is the same spineless leadership that is saying yes sir and saluting smartly to these cuts in the actually muscle mass of the armed forces. And, because Obama has made the U.S. Military into a petri dish where the deadly virus of homosexual "virtue" can grow unhindered, there are many in the U.S. Congress, once strong supporters of the U.S. Military, who will not stand up and support past levels of funding, as a matter of conscience.
In response to:

SOTU Surrender

GoldenEagles Wrote: Jan 28, 2012 2:34 AM
I think you are confusing me with GoldenHelmut. I am GoldenEagles. We don't have the same agenda.
In response to:

SOTU Surrender

GoldenEagles Wrote: Jan 28, 2012 2:34 AM
I think you are confusing me with GoldenHelmut. I am GoldenEagles. We don't have the same agenda.
In response to:

SOTU Surrender

GoldenEagles Wrote: Jan 27, 2012 2:25 PM
That's right, Romney was not even a Republican during the most important time for a person to be a Republican, and that was during the Reagan years. The Romney who wants our vote today, held his nose at the Republican Party back then.
In response to:

SOTU Surrender

GoldenEagles Wrote: Jan 27, 2012 2:18 PM
Come on Ollie, make a real difference for the future of America.
In response to:

SOTU Surrender

GoldenEagles Wrote: Jan 27, 2012 2:16 PM
Dear Ollie, I wish you would write a rebuttal to Elliot Abrams attack on Newt Gingrich in the National Review. What was Newt's crime in his eyes? He was more anti-communist than Ronald Reagan! He wanted to do more to defeat the evil empire. I respect Elliot Abrams for his work for the fight for Freedom during the Reagan administration. But he has swallowed a poison pill on behalf of Romney, who remained "independent" during this crucial time in American history. My God, Romney was not even a Republican in those days. By the way, when are you going to endorse Newt for President? I would encourage you to do so, and before the Florida Primary.
1 - 10 Next