Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:43 PM
I hope the justices on the Supreme court can see this fundamental difference. I hope they can see past the media hype and understand the current body of law governing marriage was not designed nor ever intended to apply to same sex unions and as such there was no intent to deny same sex unions the same rights as married couples.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:43 PM
If same sex couples want the same rights as married couples then let legislators sit down and write law governing that special relationship. I suggest that same sex proponents do not try to co-opt law designed for the relationship between a man and woman and try to make those laws fit a relationship that is fundamentally different!
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:42 PM
You can argue that Venus and Mars are both planets but you can’t argue they are the same. Our description of Venus is much different from our description of Mars. And so it is with marriage and same sex unions. No one can argue against creation and say that a man's parts and another man's parts were designed to fit together. No one can argue with creation and say that a woman's parts and another woman's parts were designed to fit together. And no one can deny that a man's parts and a woman's parts were indeed designed to fit together.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:41 PM
The laws governing marriage between a man and a woman, and the laws governing same sex unions, need to be different because the relationship is different. For example, the creation of life cannot occur, and was not designed to occur, between same sex couples. This makes same sex unions fundamentally different from marriage and as such there needs to be a set of laws applicable to that different relationship.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:40 PM
With Proposition 8 in California, the people decided that the definition of “marriage” is between a man and a woman. As same sex union activists would like us to believe, the law defining “marriage” between a man and a woman was not to define the word from a legal perspective, but an attempt to deny same sex union rights.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:40 PM
Proposition 8 made no mention of denying rights to same sex couples, it simply defined "marriage" as between a man and woman. If proponents of same sex unions want the same rights as what has been defined for marriage between a man and a woman, then legislators need to sit down and write a body of law governing that relationship.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:39 PM
of law governing marriage between a man and woman was written specially for that relationship. From both a legal and a natural sense, the current laws governing marriage were not designed to fit with same sex unions. Same sex unions need to have a special body of law written for that special relationship just like marriage has a special body of laws written to govern that relationship. With Proposition 8 in California, the people decided that the definition of “marriage” is between a man and a woman. As same sex union activists would like us to believe, the law defining “marriage” between a man and a woman was not to define the word from a legal perspective, but an attempt to deny same sex union rights.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:37 PM
n.The laws governing children, inheritance, and family were specially designed for this relationship. That marriage has been defined for thousands of years, and in almost all cultures around the world, as between a man and a woman is no accident. The evolution of these laws contained no ulterior motives in attempting to deny the rights of same sex couples. From the sense of nature or creation, a man and woman were designed to fit together. From this union, which we call marriage, comes life and the continuation of our species. The same cannot be said for same sex unions. Same sex unions are fundamentally different from marriage and as such there needs to be a body of law written specially for that relationship, just like the body a
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:35 PM
Looking at the current debate before the Supreme Court you have to wonder what the supporters of same sex unions are up to. Consider the laws governing marriage, for example. The laws were developed by legislators to govern the special relationship between a man and a woman. I’m quite certain when legislators were writing these laws they had the relationship between a man and a woman in mind. No one can argue there was an intent to deny same sex couples those same rights at the time the laws were written. The legislators simply had the idea of marriage between a man and a woman in mind when writing the laws. The laws governing marriage were designed to define the needs or rights arising out of a relationship between a man and woma
In response to:

Churches: Time to Fight!

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:34 PM
The union between same sex couples is NOT a marriage. The union between man and woman IS marriage.
In response to:

Churches: Time to Fight!

God_Of_War Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 11:06 PM
there be a body of law specially written, designed, and intended for that kind of relationship. And while the legislators are doing that, they should come up with a special word which describes that relationship. I’m not sure what to call it. Maybe a “Civil Union”, “Sunion” for same sex union, or maybe Glunion for gay and lesbian Union….. Call it anything you want but don’t call it a “marriage”.
Previous 11 - 20 Next