In response to:

Gun Companies to Law Enforcement in Anti-Gun States: We’re Not Doing Business With You Anymore

"Of course, there are some big names missing—Smith & Wesson, Glock and Sig Sauer" The only one of those that is any good anyway is Sig; Smith & Wesson hasn't made any decent firearms since the 1950s, and Glock has the same intuitive point & click ergonomics as a set of bookends. Seems like Smith & Wesson tried sucking up to the Clinton administration previously, and already went bankrupt once as a result.
deprogramming services Wrote: Feb 16, 2013 11:51 AM
I agree about S&W, but the Glock is a good weapon, and I'd like to see them get on board.

As the gun control debate rages on, we’ve seen a host of gun-rights advocates standing up for the Second Amendment. In addition to citizens, the NRA, the National Sheriffs Association and countless others, a number of companies—including gun manufacturers, sporting good retailers and gunsmiths—are now taking a stand by refusing to sell to law enforcement in New York and other states with restrictive gun laws.

The message in these companies’ statements is essentially about equality—local law enforcement and government agencies should not have rights that citizens do not.  Thus, if states such as New York choose to adopt restrictive...