Previous 0 - 8
In response to:

The Play’s the Thing

glindsay Wrote: Apr 26, 2013 5:10 PM
Domestic partnership failed, because separate is inherently unequal.
If you wanted to protect marriage, you would be leading the fight to make divorce harder. Instead, you have gratuitously bashed Gay and Lesbian Americans by outlawing civil unions / domestic partners in 21 states.
In response to:

The Case Against “Equality” Part 2

glindsay Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 11:21 AM
"In Massachusetts it’s Partner A and Partner B. " This is just stupid bureaucrats with no understanding of relationships. There is no reason that the license application form should not have two check boxes for each party: husband/wife and husband/wife. A straight couple has a husband and wife; a Gay couple has two husbands; a lesbian couple has two wives. Nothing complicated here.
In response to:

The Case Against “Equality” Part 2

glindsay Wrote: Mar 03, 2013 11:19 AM
Question 2 is an absurd red herring, and you know it. Allowing same-sex couples to marry in no way threatens humanity's survival, unless you take the insane next step that you imply, that same-sex marriage will be mandatory, and opposite-sex marriage banned. We need and will benefit as a society when same-sex couple can wed, because marriage stabilizes couples, and stable households are good for society. This positive good has nothing to do with whether a marriage, Gay or straight, leads to children. However, all marriages have the potential for children. Yes, same-sex couples cannot reproduce by marital coitus, but large numbers of hetero couples reproduce by assisted technology, adoption, and children from prior marriages. Get real.
Wrong, as usual from Townhall readers. Homosexuality is an orientation, and is morally neutral. It's the same as being left-handed. We can debate whether engaging in Gay sex (which is probably what you really meant to say) is sinful, but that is an action, not an orientation.
Name 3 things you are forced to do because of Gay equality under secular law.
Name 3 cases where this has happened? I predict you can't.
"Intolernce"? This is a rich coming from Townhall. You are in cahoots with NOM and ADF and have banned civil unions or domestic partnerships in 21 of the 32 states where you passed your marriage amendments.
The Bell and Weinberg study is as dated at Kinsey, and has as much scientific or cultural validity as Ptolemy's view of the solar system. B&W was a mere 9 years after Stonewall, consensual same-sex activity was still criminal in most states, and most Americans agreed with this persecution. Attitudes toward Gay and Lesbian Americans have changed so much in the past 35 years that B&W# worthless except as an historical footnote. Show me a study in the past ten years that indicates similar, and then we can see if you have any leg to stand on.
Previous 0 - 8