In response to:

Questioning Potential Cabinent Members Labelled "Bullying"

Glenn242 Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 10:08 AM
People here seem more interested in protecting guns than schoolchildren.
TommyMaq Wrote: Dec 16, 2012 12:50 PM
Broad brush generalizations are the OPPOSITE of rational consideration. Way to prove, yet again, that you seek to defend the indefensible.

Claim, argument and evidence are the accepted standards for persuasion in law, science and scholarship. Your avoidance of that standard tells everyone everything they need to know about you; you use rhetoric because you have no logic or evidence.

Now that you know that everyone can see right through you, why don't grow some integrity and go learn what you're talking about?
Harold15 Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 11:00 AM
And liberals don't give a damn about children. They have declare war on children. If they don't kill them in the womb, they'll get them after they are born.
Kimberly04 Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 10:24 AM
The gun was in the control of a psychopath. Perhaps controlling psychopaths would stop more violence instead of blaming an object.
Henry VIII Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 10:23 AM
People here are interested in protecting the sanctity of the Constitution, which you libturds willingly cherry pick and trash. You morons either throw money at a problem or think slapping an endless supply of useless regulation on top of useless regulation is a solution. Psycho's will find a way....
Glenn242 Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 10:26 AM
And not a word about protecting our schoolkids. You are a pathetic paranoid.
Keep the change Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 10:31 AM
and you, Glen, are a government addict Jonesing for a fix
Keep the change Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 10:15 AM
and freakish government addicts like you are interested in protecting liberalism and attacking inanimate objects that protect us from the horrible ideas you push all day, every day.

You people are incapable of thinking outside government "solutions"