"5) Is it unreasonable to target an anti-tax group? This is after all a group that named itself after a tax revolt that wants to abolish the IRS. It's like when a cop gets shot, the cops kind of take that personally. -- Bill Maher" So if a group opposes military spending their leadership should expect a few taniks to show up at their front door because the military might take it personally? What should politcians trying to confiscate guns expect? Maher has it all backwards. They should be giving extra scrutiny to the liberal groups. "So you want higher taxes for everyone and more government spending, but you want your group to be tax-exempt? I think we're going to need a lot more information."

The fascists and the communists like to think there is a big difference.

Acquiring the skills needed to be useful to an employer (or successful as the business owner) is considered "acting white." Learning those skills as an adult is very difficult to do.

Which is why everything they say soudns like it's right out of Orwell's 1984.

I explained that marriage is different from a homosexual relationship and therefore the free people through their elected representatives may treat a married couple as one legal unit without being obligated to treat a homosexual couple in the same way. That is not the marxist position.

The reason government recognizes/endorses/fovors marriage is because it is the best way to produce and raise the next generation. Homosexual unions are incapable of producing and an inferior way of raising the next generation. Men and women are different (no matter how much the LGBT crowd tries to obscure the fact), and children do best with one of each in the house. The debate is not just about "committed and loving relationships." You are free to have that if you want. Just don't try to call it marriage on your tax return, because it's not. The government does not have the same compelling interest to recognize homosexual unions.

"he is a molester of the United States constitution." The defendant denies having any contact whatsoever with the accuser.

What has Jeffress said that is anti-Semiitic? This is an honest question - I don't know much about the guy. I'm not trying to play gotcha, but I also don't want to see the label without knowing exactly what you mean by it.

So athiests may speak in the context of government functions, but Christians may not? It sounds like atheism has become the governemnt-established religion.

She did not say that his crimes were politically motivated. She pointed out that the MSM is very quick to blame politics if there is even the slightest connection to the right. (She didn't even mention the Aurora, CO, movie theater shooting which was initially blamed on a Tea Party member before they discovered that it was a different guy witht he same name.) The fact is if this guy praised Limbaugh, Medved, and O'Reilly instead of Matthews, Scarborough, Blitzer and Morgan, this would be a political story and the senate would be debating the fairness doctrine today. Malkin wrote to point out this double-standard, but apparently that's a bit too nuanced for someone with your limited reading comprehension.