In response to:

Three Views on Same Sex Marriage

GGG-Man Wrote: May 21, 2012 8:37 PM
I'll give it go. It appears that Mark is attempting to symbolize the marriage of two separate people and describe it as a fusion into something special, much in the same way children are a fusion of their parents. But, recall the words of Paul: "Therefore you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, are doing the very same things." (Romans 2:1)
GGG-Man Wrote: May 21, 2012 8:59 PM
Paul is actually warning his flock not to emulate him and go about judging the world. It's meant as a restraint. People are free to follow God or not to.
THE_ANSWER Wrote: May 21, 2012 8:43 PM
GGG-Man ... the 'judgment' you refer to addresses not homosexual behavior but instead moral conduct and standards of human decency and normalcy leading to law.

A lot of cultural commentators are confused these days. They believe that people’s views on same sex marriage are solely a reflection of their religious beliefs. Nothing could be further from the truth. Actually, some things could be further from the truth – like saying that Al Sharpton has integrity or that Dan Savage has class. But you get the point. The same sex marriage debate is about politics. To call it a religious debate is to miss the point entirely. Your stance on same sex marriage should vary depending on whether you consider yourself to be a conservative, a liberal,...