In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

gfisher313 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 2:11 PM
> "Love" has nothing to do with it. Despite reports from millions of men who claim otherwise. You know their hearts better than they do? Really?! This speaks to the fundamental lack of basic, human respect that's going on, here. We in the gay community report to you how we feel and truths about our families, and you insist that you know better, based on odd conjecture about a few sexual acts that turn you off--and you almost never mention lesbian sex, which is interesting.
S.17 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 3:36 PM
To the extent love includes monogamy and fidelity, we can quickly, QUICKLY, rule out "millions" of "loving" homosexual men. More like "one in a million." Why do you think George Michael keeps stumbling out from behind the bushes in public parks rather than marry Kenny? One need not be George Michael to "know" his depraved heart.

Lesbian sex is an oxymoron. Lesbians are asexual. Not to mention committed and monogamous in much greater numbers. To compare lesbians and their relationships to homosexual men is to compare koala bears to grizzly bears. Which is to say, there is no comparison.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...