In response to:

Obama Wins by Going Negative and Turning Out Base

gf3 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:13 AM
Liberals are saying they now have a mandate. All I see is marginalizing of half of the people in the USA. (the people who are picking up the check) Good luck with that.
vkarthik Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:46 AM
Majority of the welfare states are red states. facepalm.
tuttletacoma Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:49 AM
you mean places like California, Illinois, Pa, Maryland etc includiong all those big cities under the control of marxist mayors

where there are millions of parasites living on the public teat
tuttletacoma Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:24 AM
reality will start to kick in almost immediately when comrade hussein can't deliver on all the promises the imbeciles who voted for him don't come to fruition

His larger problem is that there is no honeymoon this time and he has no unspent political capitol as well as no nagcy piglosi to march in lockstep with his agenda

the only unanswered question as this point is who comrade hussein will blamed for his ongoing failures
pascagoulapappy Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:46 AM
Reality doesn't matter to the doodooheads who voted for this creep.
Lukewarm. That's the feeling I get from the election numbers.

Turnout was apparently down, at least as a percentage of eligible voters. The president was re-elected by a reduced margin. The challenger didn't inspire the turnout surge he needed.

Every re-elected president since Andrew Jackson has won with an increased popular vote percentage. Barack Obama didn't. He won 53 percent to 46 percent in 2008. His numbers as I write are 50 percent to 48 percent over Mitt Romney. That could go up to 51 percent to 48 percent when California finishes its count, which took five weeks in 2008.

Obama owes most...