In response to:

10 Facts for Liberals: Why Gun Control Can't Stop Another Newtown Massacre

gertyjm Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 12:26 PM
I think it is pretty clear that he was a deranged individual. Even if he was religious. Politics doesn't appear to be a factor. Though it seems to be conservative folks who go on and on about 2nd Amendment solutions.
Jay Wye Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 1:49 PM
READ the article.

It demonstrates how the proposed "gun control" will have NO effect.
Did you not comprehend that?

"progressives" take a simplistic,childish approach to the problem of school shootings and gun violence in general; they want to "ban all guns",or restrict them,failing to acknowledge that cannot realistically be done.It hasn't worked in any nation on Earth. guns ARE and always will be available in every nation in the world,and people in every nation are shot (or just threatened) by criminals with guns. Guns are smuggled,or made in home shops,stolen from police and military.
Jay Wye Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 1:47 PM
if you want to stop a bad guy with a gun,you need a GOOD guy with a gun.
It does not have to be police,armed ODCs are perfectly capable of doing the job.
"when seconds count,police are minutes away." or even farther away....

ODC = ordinary decent citizen
LouisianaMan225 Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 12:44 PM
Sorry if we "go on and on" about the Constitution. After all, "it's over 100 years old."

There are now calls from the Left for gun control legislation in response to Adam Lanza's unconscionable mass killing of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary. However, very few people seem to be asking the most basic question of all before getting started: What gun control legislation could have stopped Adam Lanza?

The answer is "none."

Let's consider a few alternatives:

1) The school was already a "gun free zone;" so obviously that wasn't effective. Of course, the sort of people who would respect a "gun free zone" in the first place are the very ones you wouldn't have to worry...