In response to:

Obama Campaign: Vegas Fundraiser on Day After Benghazi Massacre was "Appropriate"

Georgetwin-In-Pa Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 3:52 PM
"SuperThumpasauras Wrote: 11 minutes ago (3:36 PM) You still provide no proof, well nothing more tangible than innuendo. Too bad the power of suggestion isn't legally damning." All I was saying was for all the funds he raises, his media buys and other such campaign "must haves" are few and far between. IOW, the old smoking gun conundrum.
SuperThumpasauras Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 3:55 PM
There's no smoking gun, no squirt gun either. You're relying on innuendo and multiple unsuccessful presidential bids. By that measure, Alan Keyes, John McCain, Pat Buchanan, etc. are also guilty of campaign fraud.
Georgetwin-In-Pa Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 3:58 PM
But those you mentioned all made highly visible, media buys. I have only ever heard 1 Ron Paul ad.
SuperThumpasauras Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 3:58 PM
By calling George W Bush a tyrant
SuperThumpasauras Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 4:10 PM
Please ignore my 358 post DD, it was intended for a different post.

That said...how is this empirical evidence of campaign fraud? These accusations are just reckless when you base them on the equivalent of a definite possibility of a firm maybe of a could be of a hunch.

Once you have a grasp of this president's priorities, his team's responses to challenges like these are entirely predictable and expected.  Kudos to David Gregory for asking this tough question, to say nothing of his follow-up dig:
 


 

GREGORY: “Was it inappropriate for him to go to a fundraiser the day after this attack now in retrospect knowing that it was a terrorist attack, inappropriate for him to engage in politics as...