In response to:
"SuperThumpasauras Wrote: 11 minutes ago (3:36 PM)
You still provide no proof, well nothing more tangible than innuendo. Too bad the power of suggestion isn't legally damning."
All I was saying was for all the funds he raises, his media buys and other such campaign "must haves" are few and far between. IOW, the old smoking gun conundrum.
Once you have a grasp of this president's priorities, his team's responses to challenges like these are entirely predictable and expected. Kudos to David Gregory for asking this tough question, to say nothing of his follow-up dig:
GREGORY: “Was it inappropriate for him to go to a fundraiser the day after this attack now in retrospect knowing that it was a terrorist attack, inappropriate for him to engage in politics as...
That said...how is this empirical evidence of campaign fraud? These accusations are just reckless when you base them on the equivalent of a definite possibility of a firm maybe of a could be of a hunch.