In response to:

Don't Blame Romney

Georgetwin-In-Pa Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 3:43 PM
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!! Liberal Economics from someone who CLAIMS to have 2 Ivy League Degrees: "WatchAllisonWin Wrote: 1 minute ago (4:49 PM) Yees, they did pay it back. Whether they borrowed the money to repay it is immaterial." http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2012/02/15/communism_by_insurance_mandate/page/full/
AskGermaine Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 3:49 PM
Obviously, my comment weent right over your head.

Not surprising, since you are a very intellectually limited person.
sheepdogII Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 3:51 PM
And you a legend in your won feeble little mind
sheepdogII Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 3:52 PM
And your a legend in your own feeble little mind
rickmcq Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 3:54 PM
Actually, Allison, your comment "weent" right past logic.

The issue was whether or not the auto bailout 'saved' the auto companies, not whether or not the loans had been (partially) paid back yet.

We spent billions of dollars and billions of words on an election to switch from President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House to President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House.

Every election predictor was wrong, except one: Incumbents usually win.

Republicans have taken out a sitting president only once in the last century, and that was in 1980 when Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter. Sadly, Reagan's record remains secure.

The Democrats ran up against the incumbency problem in 2004. The landslide election for Democrats in 2006 suggests that Americans were not thrilled with...

Related Tags: Mitt Romney Barack Obama