Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Thank These Republicans for Obamacare

George3324 Wrote: Jul 19, 2014 10:28 PM
Regarding "running candidates who could not possibly win," was Romney a TEA Party man? I must be missing something here. But if you have to run RINOs to win, what's the point?
In response to:

Nanny State Targets Grocery Stores

George3324 Wrote: Jul 19, 2014 10:20 PM
Michelle Obama has recommended talking shopping carts to congratulate us when we make healthy choices. I think we need talking voting booths.
Oh, the limitations of Marxism. This has to be humbling. Well, it should be humbling.
My father lived during the prohibition era, and during that time he never saw public drunkeness. And if you don't think alcohol cunsumption was less during the prohibition era, then I am real impressed that someone of your mentality can use a keyboard.
Consider also the President's immigration policy, which is related to his foreign policy. This cannot possibly be attributed to incompetence. This is an efficiently administered plan to to render our government absolutely incapable of accomplishing its constitutional responsibilities. Consider also that Congress no longer even thinks in terms of constitutional responsibilities. Think in terms of impeachment: our present problems go a bit beyond simply lying about sex.
The Progressive's best defense of the President is to say that he is truly this incompetent. However, I believe that it is naive to say that what we see in the international arena is the result of incompetence. Given the Presiendt's background, it is more reasonable to say that the current international chaos is the direct result of one of the most efficient administrations ever to occupy the White House. What we currently see being executed is what has been planned for years by the Socialist/Marxist community.
In response to:

Lawsuits and Impeachment

George3324 Wrote: Jul 15, 2014 10:19 AM
If President Obama were to decide to remain in office after his term expired, would there be anyone to oppose him? Would Congress be too concerned about conflict and donor bases to intervene? Would the Supreme Court find some "weightier issue" to persue? Unless anyone considers my questions to be outlandish, would anyone have previously expected Congress and the Supreme Court to remain passive as our president has run roughshod over our constitution as he has?
Realities come into focus when you realize that this is no longer the United States of America, and neitehr Congress nor the people have the will to do anything about it.
There you go trying to interject logic and reason into a political argument. You know very well that that is a useless tactic in dealing with progressives. After all doesn't "progressive" mean "irrational"?
In response to:

Quit Playing Politics with Kids

George3324 Wrote: Jul 12, 2014 9:15 AM
It is interesting that the solution for illegal alien children is amnesty, whereas the solution for black children with American mothers is to abort them. What was that number? Aren't black aborted babies about 40% of the total, while they are only about 16% of the population? And the overwhelming majority of Blacks support Obama.
Making money was never the plan. The whole idea was to move money to Hillary's account.
Previous 11 - 20 Next