In response to:

Don't Blame Romney

george293 Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 1:58 PM
Romney was never meant to win - he was there to make us believe we had a choice. To make us believe that voting for one of the two Goldman Sachs candidates that things would get better. The RNC lied and cheated to get their boy the nomination. Ron Paul is the only one who could have beaten Obama. That's why the media shut Ron down. The media, the Democrats and the Republicans ALL work for Goldman Sachs and the world bankers. Of course Romney lost, nobody liked him from the get go. Every other Republican candidate from the first debates had more enthusiastic supporters than Romney. Romney has taken BOTH sides of every issue he has ever talked about. The only thing he is good at is destroying companies and send the jobs overseas.
asullivan Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 8:33 PM
RON PAUL WOULD HAVE CREAMED OBAMA IN DEBATES! You are absolutely Right No foreign aid get out of the middle east drill where we please watch our own borders EVERYONE LOVED PAUL NOT ISRAEL PAUL! Do people really Think saying I am going to War with Iran because Israel is my best friend will win votes????? Its not Romneys Fault its our Policies Most Americans are sick of Israel The Jews always support Obama that was a ruse. Reagan Won without the Jewish vote! Lets not leave out FEDERAL RESERVE RON PAUL EDUCATED PEOPLE HIS GUYS GOT IN THE CONGRESS!
anti-neocon Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 3:50 PM
yes, if ron paul had the backing of the party, and even a fraction of the resources chameleon romney had, he would have trounced obama.

it's only going to get WORSE for the establishment republicans because most young voters who were attracked to dr. paul's constitution and liberty message have now seen the contrast between a real constitutional conservative and the big government pseudoconservatives like romney and mccain. not only that, as the republican party continues to drift to the left, it is becoming more and more obvious the republican rhetoric and track record do not match. young people detest hypocrisy.
Origanalist Again Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 4:58 PM
"young people detest hypocrisy. "

And a lot of us older folks too.
george293 Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:05 PM
Could the RNC have picked a more wishy-washy guy to run?? No they couldn't have. Think about it. They ran the guy who LOST to the guy who LOST to Obama in '08. Great strategy. Then they ticked off Millions of Ron Paul supporters by cheating and changing the rules. Then they expected us to vote for Romney?? The sooner people realize that the Republicans and the Democrats are the same snake with 2 heads, the sooner we can actually start fixing thing in this country. Until then you might as well expect the guy giving out the most food stamps and free goodies paid for with someone elses money to win, because that is who is going to win. The welfare mentality is now in control. The only thing that can change things now is total collapse.
anti-neocon Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 4:06 PM
george,
i think you will agree that is was absolutely BIZARRE that the republicans would select the same man who invented obama-romneycare to save us from obama-romneycare. that has got to be the most absolutely ridiculous idea in the history of american politics!!!

We spent billions of dollars and billions of words on an election to switch from President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House to President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House.

Every election predictor was wrong, except one: Incumbents usually win.

Republicans have taken out a sitting president only once in the last century, and that was in 1980 when Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter. Sadly, Reagan's record remains secure.

The Democrats ran up against the incumbency problem in 2004. The landslide election for Democrats in 2006 suggests that Americans were not thrilled with...

Monday, May 20 | 04:13 AM ET
Monday, May 20 | 04:13 AM ET
Monday, May 20 | 04:13 AM ET
Monday, May 20 | 04:13 AM ET