In response to:

Moore: Yeah, Obama “Didn’t Talk About Jobs” in his Second Inaugural

Gene2413 Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 6:57 PM
Loiseo you are so correct, government doesn't create jobs. However, that being said I can think of three things he can do so WE can create jobs. 1. Get the government off my back and allow me to expand my business without crushing taxes and the in your face of obama care legislation. 2. Open up oil exploration, fracking, and shale oil production INSIDE the U.S. 3. Fix the tax code and allow us to keep more of our money so we can spend it as we see fit. Don't confiscate it through tax policy to fund socialist programs of wealth redistribution. No one wins here. There's three policy changes to PROMOTE job creation. That's his job. That's what he should do.
Loiso12013 Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:04 PM
1. you had those tax cuts for 8+ years; you should have done something then.
2. more domestic drilling happening now.
3. see #1.
SwimwareIsMe Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:19 PM
1. We were just fine until the Democrat created housing bubble burst.
2. Not on public lands.
3. What?

Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:21 PM
Dummy,domestic drilling occurred DESPITE Comrade Obama's best efforts to stop it.
mostly because it's on non-Federal land.

but this has been explained to you many times before.
apparently,you're unable to assimilate it.
katepatate Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:58 PM
Private domestic drilling. If Obama could stop it, he would. Let's see what he'll do about the pipeline now that a new, more environmental route has been approved. Bet he'll still not allow it. Your evil one is against oil, gas, coal and any other fuels that we can get right here in the United States. Yet he helps other countries drill their own oil.
katepatate Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:59 PM
Lois cannot win a single argument here when everything she knows is wrong. We all know where she gets her news. She will always be ignorant.
katepatate Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 8:08 PM
Knock on Lois' s head and you will hear an echo.

Many keen political observers have noticed the complete lack of a serious jobs plan, let alone an open and honest discussion about ways his administration can spur economic growth, in the president’s second inaugural address. In many respects, this comes as no surprise: the president ran a maliciously negative and unserious campaign that sought to destroy his political opponent at all costs. And it worked. But with another recession possibly on the horizon, shouldn’t this issue have been substantively addressed at some point during his somewhat lengthy remarks? The Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore addressed this question in a...