Previous 11 - 20 Next
It doesn’t matter what technological advances you have, you still need troops to hold the ground. You need the guns, bayonets, missiles, planes, tanks and ships to show strength, it comes down to a question of would you really want to attack a large well organized, highly trained force that is armed with every conceivable weapon that would give them an advantage against you? Power perceived is power achieved.
For God's Sake don't let him find out that Tomahawk usage is also on the rise. http://www.knifecollector.net/TomahawksAndWar.html
In response to:

Rapper Defends Second Amendment

Gene227 Wrote: Oct 22, 2012 5:30 PM
And didn't a plague wipe out a huge portion of the population as well?
Which is why "No-Knock Warrants" should never be allowed.
In response to:

Eliminate the TSA

Gene227 Wrote: Oct 22, 2012 3:53 PM
I haven't heard of any. What about the guy that was just caught with the huge arsenal of weapons: "Harris was singled out by a customs agent for a secondary inspection based upon the fact that he was wearing a bulletproof vest. When asked if he had anything to declare, Harris mentioned that he had a knife. Full inspection of the bag revealed a smoke grenade capable of filling a 40,000 cubic foot space with smoke, four leather-coated blackjack billy-clubs, a collapsible baton, a full-face respirator, several knifes, a hatchet, body bags, a tyvex biohazard suit, various masks, duct tape, hand cuffs, leg irons, flex cuffs, oven mitts and cooking tongs. Read more: http://www.dreamindemon.com/2012/10/10/bostonbound-man-detained-lax-carrying-
In response to:

Eliminate the TSA

Gene227 Wrote: Oct 22, 2012 2:18 PM
And planes can be destroyed from the ground with shoulder launched missles by a terrorist without ever coming near an airport. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0304.ho.html
In response to:

Obama Awakes—But Can’t Stop Mitt

Gene227 Wrote: Oct 18, 2012 2:11 PM
Romney should have turned and looked at her and asked point blank, "Why excatly do you have a transcript of that particular speech?"
No, it wasn't appropriate. It should have been cancelled and he should have wen straight back to DC to handle the business of running the republic.
In response to:

I Like Gary Johnson

Gene227 Wrote: Sep 24, 2012 1:09 PM
No, you have deep seated delusions that a third party candidate who the general public has heard either nothing or very little about is going to win the White House. Not going to happen. So since you don't get your way you want to keep the status quo even though you know that it is going to result in the further decline of our republic, And you wonder why you aren't being taken seriously. Romney is the only choice we have that will enable us to start rebuilding our nation. Maybe in the future we can have a Paul or Johnson in the White House but as it stands that is not the case.
Isreal is our Ally and you are wrong to think they aren't, so yes we should support them openly and without reservation. Romney is the best choice out of the two we have. I have mentioned both Ron Paul and Gary Johnson to just average people I know who don't follow politics and am met with blank stares. To think either of these two men are electable at this time is the heart of delusional and wishful thinking. Romney may not be the messiah the libertarians are waiting for but at least he is in the right direction the country needs to go.
So by handing our country to a proven failure for four more years means we'll somehow be better off?
Previous 11 - 20 Next