1 - 8
Anyone who thinks there is a lick of difference between the GOP and the Democratic Establishment is a fool. There is a huge big government media run by corporations, not a 'liberal' media. To say that there is 'almost no non-liberal mainstream media outlet' is very incorrect. Have you ever heard of Fox News? My heart goes out to all those grieving. True ... not once does the media ever mention the crime itself, they just talk about the guns. But, do conservatives ever talk about drug abuse instead of the drug itself? Liberals think they can stop violent crime by prohibiting weapons and conservatives think they can prohibit drugs to control drug abuse. Both think the other is wrong but both use the same reasoning. Wake up.
What's the point of winning an election if you're going to lose as a country? What point is there to voting? It's people like you that continue the charade. The people making this world worse are in control of both candidates. There is no lesser of two evils. This is like finding out who is more evil, Stalin or Hitler? Does it matter? Get involved with local and state government, or activist organizations, donate, sign petitions and change people's minds. I see your point, but you're going backwards. If you're not voting for Paul, for Johnson, that's what most Paul people are doing.
What's the point of winning an election if you're going to lose as a country? What point is there to voting? It's people like you that continue the charade. The people making this world worse are in control of both candidates. There is no lesser of two evils. This is like finding out who is more evil, Stalin or Hitler? Does it matter? Get involved with local and state government, or activist organizations, donate, sign petitions and change people's minds. I see your point, but you're going backwards. If you're not voting for Paul, for Johnson, that's what most Paul people are doing.
I wouldn't say never, people said 'never' to a lot of things. Look at how far the Marijuana legalization effort has come and look how far Audit the Fed itself has come, before Paul, NO ONE knew what that was, now everyone knows. To me that's a huge deal. Now people can simply find out what stance politicians have on that issue and they can crash and burn supporting it or do the right thing. Very powerful weapon given to us by Paul.
No, the Federal Reserve is not continuously audited, where are you getting that information from? A liberal that actually doesn't trust government to do something and instead trusts private bankers? What kind of liberal are you? So congress is inept and corrupt, and you're okay with them controlling what we get to put into our bodies and how we defend ourselves, not to mention control of our medicine and health insurance, but if it's the money supply, then let the bankers control it? Nothing is being sold, there is no selling, there is only educating. No central bank is necessary and there is no need for reform, it needs to be abolished. Let congress be blamed for future economic disasters and then vote them out.
Nothing you say moralizes the disarmament of innocent people. Owning a weapon is not a crime nor is it violent. How would you disarm someone? With guns of course - if you were to do this you would be committing a crime, but you liberals and conservatives love to get government to control other people for you, that way you get all the goodies without risking your neck. Bring up some statistics or facts before you post things like that. Accidents happen all the time.
You're using a logical fallacy, using a false premise and drawing a false conclusion. Most of the world's greatest thinkers were atheist or spiritual but not religious. Does it make sense for an atheist to draw loose conclusions like that? Stalin and all those others were atheists but still had a dogmatic belief in Big Government, something liberals and yes, the truth hurts, conservatives too. You all love government, big government your way. When it gets big enough, you get things like tyrannical police states and dictatorships. Blaming religion on anything is stupid or using it to declare that you are somehow moral because of it.
You're using a logical fallacy, using a false premise and drawing a false conclusion. Most of the world's greatest thinkers were atheist or spiritual but not religious. Does it make sense for an atheist to draw loose conclusions like that? Stalin and all those others were atheists but still had a dogmatic belief in Big Government, something liberals and yes, the truth hurts, conservatives too. You all love government, big government your way. When it gets big enough, you get things like tyrannical police states and dictatorships. Blaming religion on anything is stupid or using it to declare that you are somehow moral because of it.
1 - 8