In response to:

3 Qualities the 2016 Republican Presidential Nominee Must Have

Gayle__CO Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 12:51 PM
All I can say is, if Mitt Romney was unsuitable as a candidate because of his " wooden personality and awkward jokes" along with inconsistencies in governorship, then please explain to me how Al Gore got the Democratic nomination in 2000 and actually won the popular vote. I mean, seriously folks, are we concluding that Al Gore was a better Democrat candidate than Republican candidate Mitt Romney? Or, do we just expect a whole lot more out of Republicans than we do Democrats?
JasonCharleston Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 12:55 PM
We have to run superman. The Democrats can run rapists and chick killers.
Earl29 Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 1:05 PM
You may just have a good point there, Jason.

I must confess in 2012 -- almost from the beginning -- I felt inclined to vote for Mitt Romney for president of the United States. His intellect, extraordinary business record, and honorable career in public service convinced me that he was uniquely qualified to serve faithfully in that office. But there was something else: As a moderate hailing from a deeply blue state, I thought he could appeal to centrist Republicans and right-leaning Independents nationwide -- perhaps enough of them to give him a decided edge on Election Day.

Unfortunately, that didn’t happen.

And yet to say that Governor Romney...