1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

Gatspy Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 9:01 AM
First of all regulation was part of the jobs that the Founding Fathers gave the federal government and that is to regulate interstate commerce. May of the rules/laws created by agencies need to be done away with and that is what Romney is talking about and that is the unintended failures of some regulations that kill businesses and hence, jobs. If you want to run some numbers by returning the federal government to its size at the end of the Bush era the country would save close to half a trillion 452 billion to be exact. Anyone can smoke screen statistics. You have done a lot of good work in the past. I can't understand why you are now going dumb on us.
Keynesian economics cannot work on a global economic level. America imports much more than it exports. Money printed in the United States leaves the United States as cash and comes back as chinese t.v.s, computers, examples of finished products and raw resources like oil. The rest of the world is going to get tired fast of the funny money America is generating 40 billion dollars a month. Good thing we have debit cards or else we would need wheel barrels like the Germans after World War I to get a loave of bread.
In response to:

The Fallacy of Redistribution

Gatspy Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 5:53 AM
If the regulations that Obama puts on business were put on Ivy League Universities and especially the Professors America would have politicians that could deal with reality and people instead of widgets. Idealism is what is killing this nation. Redistribution works best when the local church gets items from the local community members who then figure out ways to to help feed and cloth the homeless and disenfranchised. It is not a government job to feed people.
That is a nice Chici\ano argument! Reagan's amnesty was suppose to have employment arrangements so that no one coming into the country could work; because the employer would pay heavy fines or go to jail themselves for hiring illegals. Why can't Mexicans make it in Mexico are you that incompetant that you need the American citizen to take care of all their needs medical, food, cash, education etc. This problem will never end and before you know it the chicano"s will have won control of the entire country. Then I give the entire planet less than fifty years until there is no longer freedom and liberty on earth. Even the third generation Mexicans do not want the illegals in the country.
In response to:

Christianity is Compatible with Ayn Rand

Gatspy Wrote: Sep 11, 2012 7:21 AM
The reason why there is the term agnostic is exactly because of the argument that you explained so well above. Your right but I have never heard a pastor talk about social justice. Social jusiice is the goodness of a Christian helping his fellow man and not expecting the government to do that and that is why church donations can be wrote off. President Obama today did not mention God in his 9/11 speech, instead he told people to go out and do community service. Christians do community service everyday and that is why Christ and not Obama should be praised and prayed too.
Thanks for telling the American people the comment one reader makes about the left calling you a racist is ironic and funny. What I worry about is when being called a America lover is worse than being called a racist and that is what the Democrates ultimate goal is-- to destroy America as we know it. The moral stats are good, but its been about twenty years and the liberals think that they are good stats, the liberal teachers control the students and that is why the morality of the country is down the tubes
In response to:

Legitimate Rape Arguments

Gatspy Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 7:15 AM
The author is right the in case of rape clause or out breaksdown the whole argument. It's O.K. to kill that baby and not other babies. Maybe we should expand on that its ok to kill black or hispanic babies, but illegal to kill white babies. Ofcoarse the last statement is terrible and low, but do not think that the pro-choice lawyers wouldn't go there, it is obvious they are very sick individuals to start with. I have a better argument it should be called for the saving of the mother's life, her mental well-being. That to carry the baby would have severe emotional and mental problems. For the wellness and to insure that the mother has a normal life. The women needs the right for her own mental well-being to have an abortion
In response to:

A Grand Old Party in Panic

Gatspy Wrote: Aug 24, 2012 9:06 AM
I know that Pat Buchanan is right on everything mentioned above. I just want to add one thing that the party could of used like a snare on Obama. When Obama was a jr. Senator in Indiana he voted to make sure that a partial-birth abortion was legal. Just talking about that would make Obama look like a heartless coward. I mean who would vote to crush a babies skull as it is just ready to be born. I think that is murder, these Democrats are nuts. 56 million Americans dead. We would not even of needed the amount of immigration that America is taking in each year if the women of the United States were not such heartless female dogs.
In response to:

An Open Letter to President Obama

Gatspy Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 9:18 AM
I wrote thing and lost it when I hit the backspace button. It is terrible the way that the lbgt group has decided to ignore the rights of the rest of us Americans. Christians have been very tolerant towards everyone since the 1960s. However, now when push comes to shove remember that their is a right to defend oneself when attacked.
In response to:

Same-Sex Marriage Thought Police?

Gatspy Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 8:55 AM
The whole debate on same sex marriage is a waste. That was a good analogy I like to smoke and I have to move away from doors and cant smoke in certain places, but I understand as a human being that what I do is offensive. I do not think that the Kiss off should be legal in fact displays between same sex couples I would argue could cause pshcological damage and confusion among your children. Homosexual activity is a defect and mental illness like the DSM II had pointed out. How can something be normal if the behavior means that you can not reproduce that goes against all logic.
1 - 10 Next