In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

GatoLuchador Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 12:19 PM
Exactly. Gay people are free to own property, live anywhere, do anything, and be treated equally in court. So, how are their rights being violated if we agree that marriage is a hetero institution? It's contrived. On the contrary, they are being used as tools to attack religious freedom. I, as a Christian, do not have the right to redefine Jewish or Islamic traditions. That would be arrogant on my part. Therefore, neither should a secular person or body have the right to redefine my traditions.
GatoLuchador Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 2:08 PM
You already know it's not. So, why should a minority tread on the traditions of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc.? What gives them the right?
Jack2894 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 12:47 PM
SO marriage is a CHristian tradition only?

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...