In response to:

‘Marriage Equality’ Spells ‘Marriage Extinction’

GatoLuchador Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 2:47 PM
Maybe we should delegate family matters like marriage to separate religious courts. Then those courts would have jurisdiction over their followers. Gay people would have to find a court that sanctions their relationships. And then for tax purposes, the secular courts would judge us as individuals with/without dependents. That might stop the whole gay marriage debate.
dhart Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 2:51 PM
Maybe we should actually adhere to the Establishment Clause contained in the Fist Amendment.
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 2:53 PM
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:00 PM
Dhart, was the Fist Amendment introduced by the State or Fecal Government?
GatoLuchador Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:09 PM
I've heard arguments that traditional marriage establishes religion. Now, you use it against my suggestion. I think my suggestion actually harmonizes w/first amendment because you choose what set of laws to subject yourself -- even allows for competition if you will.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:27 PM
He was thinking about last night in that highway rest stop.

This week the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on two of the most critical cases of our time. On Tuesday, March 26, attorneys will make the pitch both for and against California’s Proposition 8. This, of course, is the Golden State’s pro-marriage amendment. It maintained the timeless definition of natural marriage as between man and wife.

Then, on Wednesday, March 27, the high court will consider the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), passed in 1996 with overwhelming bipartisan support and signed into law by then President Bill Clinton. It, likewise, secured the definition of legitimate marriage...