In response to:

Gun Violence -- Let's Shift the Odds in Favor of the Good Guys!

Gary 919 Wrote: Dec 20, 2012 2:46 PM
According to the news I heard on T.V. shortly after the shooting, it had been determined that the assault rifle the shooter had with him had not even been fired. Was there later information which determined that it had been used in the killing spree?
Roy323 Wrote: Dec 20, 2012 8:11 PM
Gary-"was there later Information" No! Not that I heard about. As I indicated earlier, the overall scheme (and that's what it is) is to deprive US Citizens (the Law Abiding Variety) of their right to possess Weaponry. And that is exactly when I become less than totally Law Abiding. I suspect I'll have much Company?

The unimaginable horror of Sandy Hook jumpstarts another "national conversation" about firearm violence. President Barack Obama, promising "meaningful action," said: "We will have to change. ... We can't tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end."

Let's examine four of the "commonsense" measures frequently proposed by "gun control advocates":

One, closing the "gun show loophole." What gun show loophole? Restricted from selling at guns shows prior to 1986, a licensed dealer today requires a background check whether he sells guns at a store, a gun show or the back of his SUV.

Two, banning "high-capacity" magazines. One of...