In response to:

Drought! Famine! Global…Cooling?

GAMMA-RAY-BURSTER Wrote: Oct 16, 2012 2:07 AM
Fletcher... the sun's energy output has never been to a degree required to effect global warming. The variance would need to be some 100 times greater.To achieve this would violate theories and known dynamic principles in astrophysics.
FletchforFreedom Wrote: Oct 16, 2012 2:20 AM
Again, repeating nonsense that goes beyond the actual science does not make the nonsense true. The actual science (which requires no such theory violation) expressly notes the significant long-term impact of the sun on global temperatures. The variance would need to be much greater to account for short-term variations (again, subject to albedo) but those short-term variations are built on a threshold of those long-term impacts so again, you have gone beyond the science ... which you apparently cannot grasp.
GAMMA-RAY-BURSTER Wrote: Oct 16, 2012 2:25 AM
Fletcher... simply incorrect.
FletchforFreedom Wrote: Oct 16, 2012 2:32 AM
That pretty much sums up the entire contribution you've provided so far.
inkling_revival Wrote: Oct 16, 2012 7:30 AM
It sounds as though both of you are in over your heads here.

Climate experts from United Kingdom’s National Weather Service told the world that while is was not unusual for pauses in global warming that last for a decade to occur once every eighty years or so, there was no way that one could last for 15 years or more according to their climate model.

Oops. Their mistake, I guess.

Maybe that’s why when the United Kingdom’s National Weather Service updated their data and it showed that global warming has been paused for the last 16 years, they remained mum.

“The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new...