In response to:

The Sequester May Not Be “Fair,” but It’s Real and It Would Slow the Growth of Government

G. Joan Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:08 PM
This Dictator in the White house can give an executive order that can undo anything and change anything that he wants. There is not one, no not one soul in the congress that can do anything about it. He ignores laws that he does not like and does what the heck he wants to. Tell me I am wrong.

Much to the horror of various interest groups, it appears that there will be a “sequester” on March 1.

This means an automatic reduction in spending authority for selected programs (interest payments are exempt, as are most entitlement outlays).

Just about everybody in Washington is frantic about the sequester, which supposedly will mean “savage” and “draconian” budget cuts.

If only. That would be like porn for libertarians.

In reality, the sequester merely means a reduction in the growth of federal spending. Even if we have the sequester, the burden of government spending will still be

Related Tags: Government