1 - 10 Next
Hysterical! Boxer is, and always has been, a buffoon. That's about the only title she deserves. I grew up believing that the title "Ma'am" was an automatic response given out of respect for a person's age. I'm (much) older now, and thus feel no reason to bestow titles that are unearned. Buffoon Boxer. That's all I've got . . .
Ben Shapiro, I love you, man! You hit all 5 nails on the head . . .
In response to:

Reformed Sex Writers

fuzztone Wrote: May 13, 2010 4:58 PM
Behave like a trollop, then act surprised when you are treated like one. And this woman was Harvard-educated? Or I supposed she just bought into the "Sex and the City" message that being a tramp was empowering and cool. Again, the same question . . . this is what a Harvard education brings?

Well, this State U educated reader is not a bit surprised. Perhaps reality is outside of the bubble.
What's more priceless than look on Andrea Mitchell's face is the snicker at the end of the clip. Did she and others have their collective heads in the sand when the ClimateGate emails were released publicly? With that revelation of collusion on the part of leading GW scientists, how in the world can she be surprised that anyone is challenging their "settled" point of view?

Someone please tell her that science, by definition, is for all intents and purposes NEVER settled.
In response to:

Fidel Castro’s Birthday

fuzztone Wrote: Aug 13, 2010 9:15 AM
I grew up in the early 70s in Florida, knowing personally several Cuban families that had been able to flee their homeland when Castro took over a decade earlier. Thank you for telling the truth about this coward and monster. All these years later, I can only shake my head at the glorifying of him and Che.
In response to:

Climate Skeptics Need Mental Help?

fuzztone Wrote: Dec 09, 2009 11:52 AM
This article speaks to truth. This is just the message I got when discussing the subject with a person who'd bought into the GW argument merely by hearing about it all the time via the MSM. This person was in no way an enviro-religious zealot. Just your common and normally intelligent bystander. Trouble was, she don't bother to dig deeper into this subject to see what was really going on . . .

I asked the question: If the average temp in Antarctica is 55 below zero, how is the ice melting? It would take a nearly 90 degree increase just to reach the freezing/melting point . . .

Her response was to accuse ME of being narrow-minded . . .
In response to:

Don't Cop an Attitude

fuzztone Wrote: Jul 25, 2009 12:25 PM
...we're headed toward a day when the police will not be allowed to confront, much less arrest, a black man because it's racist to do so. Does that sound ridiculous? Of course it does. However, much of what we accept as commonplace today would have seemed ridiculous a decade or two ago.
. . . Helen Thomas was stunned at the reaction to her comments. Why else would she willing/knowingly make such remarks to a rolling video camera only to attempt a retraction later? I believe it's because she exists inside the bubble. Not the DC bubble so much as the liberal media bubble. Something tells me she expected to be praised for her comments because she was singing the prevailing opinion. She was a parrot just telling everyone what she/they already knew/felt. Then to have her statements vilified, she had to be quite surprised. These people (media) truly have no clue what the bulk of Americans believe out here in "fly-over" country. Yet another in the myriad examples of media mouthpieces that are hopelessly out of touch. They are...
In response to:

Let’s Go To The Video Tape

fuzztone Wrote: Jun 06, 2010 9:15 AM
I know this article is about the ridiculous media response to the flotilla. Seems pretty clear that Israel was right in handling it the way they did, though any loss of life is tragic.

But on the perfect game/baseball call . . . why has no one mentioned what appears a valid reason for Jim Joyce to miss this call? The pitcher clearly double-clutched the ball in his glove. His foot was on the bag, yes. But he caught the ball and then pawed at it with his mitt as if to imply that he really didn't have possession of it the first time. That action with his glove could easily have given the umpire the impression that the runner was safe when viewed in real-time. Still think the call was wrong, but given the above, it's easier to see...
In response to:

Rewriting History on Abortion

fuzztone Wrote: Feb 16, 2010 4:25 PM
Nicely done. Not much more need be said. Thanks.
1 - 10 Next
Monday, June 04 | 04:35 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 04:35 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 04:35 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 04:35 PM ET