a couple of posts on another blog that seem relevant to this conversation.

http://www.finepolitics.com/the-fantastic-world-of-paul-dri essen/

http://www.finepolitics.com/paul-coulter-driessen/

"Seems to"? The issue is about a CIA operation that may not have been technically operational. That's the only thing Mr. Tyrrell got right.

But, having read Mr. Tyrrell's stuff before, that comes as no surprise.

Because I just saw an article on the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Pacific-Decadal-Oscillation .htm

"Successful deployment of renewable sources like wind and solar depend on the backup of hydro, nuclear and gas facilities that can be turned up when needed. American can’t depend upon one answer to our future energy needs, we must pursue all our options"

From what I can tell, your voting record suggests you think otherwise.

Voted NO on tax incentives for energy production and conservation. (May 2008)
Voted NO on tax incentives for renewable energy. (Feb 2008)
Voted NO on investing in homegrown biofuel. (Aug 2007)
(Well, I'll grant you this one. No complaints from me on opposing biofuel.)
Voted NO on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels. (Aug 2001)