In response to:

GOP Aims to Ease Bloodshed in 2016 Primary Debates

FreeThinkerGuy Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:12 PM
Romney lost, pure and simple, because he didn't repudiate his failed "Romneycare" plan. Had he come out and stated that, as a governor it was his responsibility to attempt something, that is what states do, and that it failed miserably, he could have done something useful, even if he had lost. I believe that conviction, along with a (moderately) better economic plan, would have allowed him to win and nobody would be saying the repub party is in decline. As it is, he constantly supported his plan and caused enormous harm to the country as we shall see in the coming years.
OriginalWinghunter Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 10:39 PM
Romney was a two-faced lying sack of sh!t. NO ONE remotely sane could believe a word coming out of his mouth.

"While we were playing footsie debating each other 22 times, they were spending $100 million on technology," Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said last week, referring to his party's rigorous debate schedule in the 2012 GOP presidential primary season. The last campaign, many Republican insiders said during a recent RNC meeting, had too many debates, the result of which was a GOP arguing with itself while Democrats prepared the way for Barack Obama's victory.

There's no doubt the Republican debates produced many damaging moments for the party. There was Mitt Romney's $10,000 bet offer, which helped cement his image as...