In response to:

The Limits of Liberal "Tolerance"

Free_Markets_Free_People Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 7:54 AM
If someone can actually look at this and think of it as art, is a complete moron. However, it is an effective form of politcal speech which - once again - exposes the left as tolerant of only those who agree with them. The American people need to wake up and reject the democratic party (generally) as having been coopted by racist demogods with a radical agenda which will destroy what is left... er I mean what is remaining of the America we love so much. Back to the constitution. See Lincoln the movie and pay particular attention to the argument the president makes for the 13th amendment. Progressives will need to cover their ears... it is a federalist argument, and a good one.
Drifter33 Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 8:00 AM
The "liberal" left is anything but. They are "My-Way-or-the-Highway" totalitarians who are not "liberal" in the least, except in one respect: they will "liberally" spend other peoples' money.

These hard leftists will accept only one way: their own. They are not interested in the US Constitution (as originally written & legally amended); they care only for their own twisted interpretations.
Kuwull Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 8:01 AM
dimmigods is closer to the truth.

Hey, it was A-OK for the National Endowment for the Arts to fund the infamous Andres Serrano "Piss Christ."  Submerging a representation of the Messiah in a jar of excrement and then taking a picture of it is "art," and museums have an obligation to "challenge the public," you see.

But don't dare even think about placing a representation of the Obamessiah in a jar of beer, calling to mind that famous piece of "art" -- because then guys like Michael Moore will get all "wee wee'd up" (in the President's memorable formulation in another context).  Avert your eyes,...