In response to:

"Flying Piano" Costs Pentagon $1.5 Trillion

Fred150 Wrote: Apr 30, 2012 9:29 AM
The comment on Luke AFB is out of place in this article. IF there is to be an F-35, the training should be at Luke. Luke is in Arizona and McCain is from Arizona - and he's right. Luke is a national treasure for training fighter pilots - souce of training for the three fighters I flew in the USAF - F-100, F-4, F-15. A discussion of the merits (cost/benefit) of the F-35 is another issue. Did you know that the F-15E is much more complex than the F-15C and D and has a higher reliability - It was designed to be 20% more reliable during 1982-86 development - more capable (dual role), lower logistics demand (cargo airplanes filled with support) for deploying a squadron, higher reliability (breaks less - higher MTBF/MTBMA) and more maintainable.
Brian1078 Wrote: May 01, 2012 10:41 PM
It's the F-16 training school now. They have lots of open space to fly over and are only a few minutes flight from the Goldwater bombing range.

The Pentagon is about to waste $1.5 trillion, 38% of entire defense budget for a "virtual flying piano". That may sound preposterous, and it is. Unfortunately, it is also true.

Foreign Policy Magazine discusses the sad saga of The Jet That Ate the Pentagon.

This month, we learned that the Pentagon has increased the price tag for the F-35 by another $289 million -- just the latest in a long string of cost increases -- and that the program is expected to account for a whopping 38 percent of Pentagon procurement for defense programs, assuming its cost will grow no...

Related Tags: Pentagon
Sunday, May 19 | 02:12 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 02:12 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 02:12 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 02:12 PM ET