In response to:
The Russians will not attack, pre-emptively or otherwise. Put quite simply they do not need to because Obama has already surrendered and has further given notice that he is prepared to concede even more. What exactly did you think the open mic comment that "after the election I will have more flexibility" was about?
As soon as he got into office Obama acquiesced to pressure from Putin regarding the agreement reached between Bush and Poland about siting a purely defensive weapon on Polish soil. As for Biden trying to say this Administration would be better on Foreign Policy than Romney would be, well the man is a buffoon. Just look at their record, apologising to the Arab World, portraying America as arrogant to the rest of the world
Remember Vice President Joe Biden's foreign policy speech at New York University last week? He slammed Mitt Romney for his "ignorance" about missile defense, and claimed that President Obama had managed to "reset" our relationship with Russia. Well, it looks like relations are still tenuous with our former chief global adversary. They're convinced that NATO missile defense sites sprinkled around Europe are aimed at Russian nuclear weapons, and not Iran, as the Alliance maintains. And if they don't like the look of the program, they're willing to strike pre-emptively:
Russia’s most senior military officer said Thursday that...
America is now weaker than it has been since before WW l in many ways, and it will only get weaker under this Administration.
It would be interesting to see what would happen if Israel would make that suggestion.