We are having the same debate in the UK over Google, Amazon, Starbucks and others. The point is that this Tax Avoidance NOT Tax Evasion, the former being legal the latter criminal. Both in the UK and US if Government think it is wrong then change the Law. But the Chair of the Parliamentary Committee in the UK (a Left Wing MP) is involved in a family business on the Board, and whilst vilifying these companies has paid minimal corporation tax herself. Rand Paul is absolutely correct a very large mirror is required.

So was Hitlers SS when they changed from killing Jews in the backs of trucks by carbon monoxide and by shooting them on the edge of trenches to using Zyklon B in purpose built Gas Chambers. Tyrants always do things in order to become "more efficient", but to what end - usually to eradicate their opposition.

Given the control freakery of the present Incumbent and his Administration do we really believe this? No didn't think so!

Sorry about the repeats, I had a problem with the Post Comment button.

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!