Note the difference in approach. Fort Hood 13 killed by Islamic Officer in US Army shouting Allah is Great, Obama response will not call it an act of Islamic Jihadi Terrorism but instead calls it to this day an act of work place violence. One UK off duty soldier slaughtered in a London Street his killers shout Allah is Great, British Prime Minister says, this appears to be Islamic Terror but we will investigate. Mr President wake up for Gods sake!

They would, allegedly, welcome that as they would become martyrs and be rewarded by Allah with numerous virgins. Western nations must outlaw Islam and if these people really want to practice it then they should do so in an Islamic state. The Left and the PC brigade may see this as extreme, but just try attending a Christian service or opening a Christian Church in Saudi and see what happens. We are expected to respect their religion and their laws, but they are apparently free to flout ours.

This action clearly indicates that either a) she herself is guilty of a criminal act, or b) she is attempting to take the heat off very senior members of this Administration, possibly even the Oval Office. There is clearly much more to come and the Left can no longer portray this as a purely Republican Political witch hunt against this President.

We are having the same debate in the UK over Google, Amazon, Starbucks and others. The point is that this Tax Avoidance NOT Tax Evasion, the former being legal the latter criminal. Both in the UK and US if Government think it is wrong then change the Law. But the Chair of the Parliamentary Committee in the UK (a Left Wing MP) is involved in a family business on the Board, and whilst vilifying these companies has paid minimal corporation tax herself. Rand Paul is absolutely correct a very large mirror is required.

So was Hitlers SS when they changed from killing Jews in the backs of trucks by carbon monoxide and by shooting them on the edge of trenches to using Zyklon B in purpose built Gas Chambers. Tyrants always do things in order to become "more efficient", but to what end - usually to eradicate their opposition.

Given the control freakery of the present Incumbent and his Administration do we really believe this? No didn't think so!

Sorry about the repeats, I had a problem with the Post Comment button.

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!

This scarcely qualifies as news since Obama and the Democrats have, since the beginning of his first term made it abundantly clear that they have neither inclination or intent to cut spending in any meaningful way. What is crystal clear is that any reduction in Defence spending achieved will immediately be used to fund his socialist agenda so that in reality there will be no reduction of any size. Indeed given his Tax hikes which, along with increased regulation, will stifle ANY and ALL recovery entitlement spending will increase as the unemployment grows, which of course he will try to offset with - yes further Tax hikes!