In response to:

Socialist or Fascist

Francis W. Porretto Wrote: Jun 12, 2012 6:46 AM
The correct tag for Obama and his fellow-thinkers is "social-fascist." Their overt rationale is social welfare; their tactical (i.e., political) approach is fascistic. Strategically, of course, they share the goal of totalitarians of all stripes: unchecked power over all things. How utterly blind America must have been, to allow this man and his lieutenants into power.
n2win Wrote: Jun 12, 2012 7:09 AM
Agreed, Unfortunately many of "We the people" (myself included) have been asleep and "blind" to what has been happening in our country for over 100 years. Giving the "social-fascist" a 100 year head start. Fortunately, we are awakening and making great strides in curtailing the progressive agenda in the last 2 years (think Tea Party Nov. 2010 and Gov. Scott Walker). But Liberty takes vigilance and we must be ever vigilant against the would be/wanna be tyrants that seek to enslave our great nation.
Dan107 Wrote: Jun 12, 2012 7:21 AM
No worries. The nation has awoken.
It bothers me a little when conservatives call Barack Obama a "socialist." He certainly is an enemy of the free market, and wants politicians and bureaucrats to make the fundamental decisions about the economy. But that does not mean that he wants government ownership of the means of production, which has long been a standard definition of socialism.

What President Obama has been pushing for, and moving toward, is more insidious: government control of the economy, while leaving ownership in private hands. That way, politicians get to call the shots but, when their bright ideas lead to disaster, they...