In response to:

Obama’s Psycho Job Phobia

FletchforFreedom Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 9:31 AM
What's amazing is that anyone is actually stupid enough to do anything but laugh hysterically at the drivel about the "green economy" from Brookings. The green economy is so ill defined (anything with an "environmental benefit") it can include sales of Beano to reduce greenhouse gasses. That makes both the definition and the size entirely meaningless. The "clean economy" did NOT outperform the rest of the economt but was artificially bolstered by (entirely wasted) government handouts (which the report sort of admits). Whether or not any industry is "manufacturing or export intensive" is economically irrelevant (as any economist can tell you). The "environmental risk" has been overblown by several orders of magnitude...
FletchforFreedom Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 9:32 AM
...to the actual science).
ALL profits are "privatized" as they should be (after all, private profits are the ONLY thing that creates jobs and increases worker compensation).

Good news everyone: Jobless claims on a weekly basis fell to a five-year low according to the Labor Department.

Bad news everyone: Yet still more people remain jobless.

And why is that? Because Obama doesn’t care about jobs.

When you reckon out the newest jobless figures using the Obama’s best calculus, the weekly decline doesn’t mean that fewer people are unemployed.

That would be asking way too much from an administration that seems phobic about private-sector job creation.

“Applications for jobless benefits decreased by 37,000 to 335,000 in the week ended Jan. 12, the lowest level since the period ended Jan....